The Evidence Locker: Inside the Case of The Golden State Killer - CityThink - Los Angeles magazine
 
 

The Evidence Locker: Inside the Case of The Golden State Killer

A slide show of crime scene photos and other evidence

 
 
carousel 1 carousel 2 carousel 3 carousel 4 carousel 5 carousel 6 carousel 7 carousel 8 carousel 9 carousel 10 carousel 11 carousel 12 carousel 13 carousel 14 carousel 15 carousel 16 carousel 17
carousel 1
 

Keith and Patrice Harrington. They were found bludgeoned to death in a bedroom of their home in Dana Point on August 19, 1980.  They had been married for only a few months when they became the Golden State Killer’s victims.

carousel 2
 

This photo is from the East Area Rapist Task Force files and is an example of the type of home the Golden State Killer (known as EAR by authorities) routinely chose for an attack: single story with a detached garage in a middle- to upper-middle-class neighborhood.

carousel 3
 

Ligatures used by the Golden State Killer in an attack in Northern California in the 1970s.

carousel 4
 

When he attacked couples, the Golden State Killer frequently ordered the female victim to tie up the male. The killer would become agitated and threatening if he felt the knots were being tied too loosely.

carousel 5
 

The Golden State Killer often used shoelaces to bind his victims.

carousel 6
 

The aftermath of a Golden State Killer attack. Note the plates on the bed. One of his most twisted techniques was to stack dishes on top of a bound male victim’s back, telling him that if he heard the dishes fall, he’d kill the female, whom he would then lead into another room to rape.

carousel 7
 

Shoelace ligatures from a Golden State Killer crime scene.

carousel 8
 

Ligatures on the floor. Note the towel near the bed. The Golden State Killer often threw towels over his victims’ heads as a head covering/blindfold.

carousel 9
 

Shoelace ligatures cut off a victim in a Golden State Killer attack.

carousel 10
 

An example of the kind of suburban neighborhood where the Golden State Killer prowled for victims.

carousel 11
 

A shoe impression from the scene of a Golden State Killer attack.

carousel 12
 

Another shoe impression from the East Area Rapist Task Force files. The Golden State Killer (known as EAR by authorities) preferred tennis or running shoes and was believed to wear a shoe size between 8½ and 9½.

carousel 17
 

The Golden State Killer’s telltale shoe impressions were often left in the soft earth around a victim’s house as he circled, looking for a way inside.

carousel 18
 

Another shoe impression from the task force files.

carousel 13
 

Investigators spent time trying to determine what exact brand of shoe the Golden State Killer wore. Here is one possibility: the Adidas SL 72 running shoe, first launched at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich.

carousel 14
 

Another running shoe possibility: the New Balance 320, first released in 1976.

carousel 15
 

Three chain store-brand running shoes investigators considered in their search for the Golden State Killer’s shoe type.

 
 
 
 

Killer

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. dana montana posted on 03/03/2013 07:40 AM
    Great article...tho I certainly remember the Zodiac Killer from my childhood days in So Cal, I can't say that I remember hearing about this guy. That said I have a couple of comments. WHY have the authorities waited so long to release this information...and .... why with such a distinct shoe print are they showing shoe soles that in no way match the evidence?

    One more thing...let's all put our collective cyber skills together...SHARE this... and put this guy behind bars where he belongs!

    I appreciate you in advance!
  2. dana montana posted on 03/03/2013 07:51 AM
    Okay, now reading the online version...seems like all the folks who were at the crime prevention meeting at Del Dayo Elementary School @ a time when the attacks were in full swing...

    "When a man rose at a crime prevention meeting at Del Dayo Elementary School and questioned how men could fail to protect their wives, he and his wife became victims—case number 21 in the files."

    well, obviously the guy was in the room with them...at least it seems that way...

    anyone??
    1. Jake Harris posted on 09/25/2013 06:34 AM
      @dana montana It would seem obvious he was in the room, but there are other ways he could have obtained that information. Someone else at the meeting could have told him or he may have been able to obtain a transcript from the meeting. Perhaps someone he knew was recording the meeting.

      I tend to think he was there, but there are many other ways he could have obtained that information. Or, it was just a matter of chance.
showing all comments
 
more promotions
 
Advertisement
Close

Advertisement