Four Questions For Robert Rotstein - The Culture Files Blog - Los Angeles magazine
 
 

Four Questions For Robert Rotstein

The author discusses his debut novel, “Corrupt Practices”

Robert Rotstein’s first novel, Corrupt Practices (which came out June 4th), is a realization of the old adage “write what you know.” The L.A.-based entertainment attorney introduces us to L.A.-based Parker Stern (also a lawyer), whose golden-boy career comes crashing down in the wake of his mentor’s suicide. Here Rotstein tells us how he managed to extract fiction out of fact, why L.A. was the perfect backdrop for this legal thriller, and what we can expect to see next from Parker Stern.

Photograph by Glen La Ferman

The protagonist of Corrupt Practices, down-and-out attorney Parker Stern, shares a profession with you. Though the book is fiction, did you find your own experiences inadvertently seeping into the narrative?
I do use some of my own experiences, though most of the time intentionally (I hope!). For Corrupt Practices, I took some incidents from my professional career and then fictionalized them extensively. For example, the book begins with the death of a prominent Beverly Hills attorney. That incident is loosely based on the actual, shocking suicide of a former high-powered partner in my firm in the early 1980s. I combined that occurrence with a second event inspired by real-life events. In the novel, Parker Stern’s former colleague is arrested for embezzling from his client. Two former colleagues of mine were jailed for allegedly doing just that in separate incidents. When I combined the embezzlement idea with the unfortunate death of the former partner, I had the germ of Corrupt Practices.

The Church Of the Sanctified Assembly that you describe in the book sounds eerily similar to the Church of Scientology. Seeing as you grew up in Los Angeles, did the Scientology culture that is so prevalent here play a role in your research or your inspiration?
The cult in Corrupt Practices is completely fictional. I researched a number of different cults and religions going back centuries, and then in the writing process combined that information, along with my imagination, to come up with the Assembly. However, as an L.A. native, I’ve always been interested in the seemingly indigenous Southland religious movements, many of which seem to be part of Hollywood culture. I’ve for many years been fascinated with the story of L.A. faith-healing evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson, who in the 1920s and 30s built the Angelus Temple. McPherson pioneered the use of the media to spread her gospel, became a Hollywood star, and might have staged her own kidnapping to cover up plastic surgery, an abortion—or maybe just for publicity. Kathryn Kuhlman, Herbert Armstrong, and his son Garner Ted seemed ubiquitous on weekend local TV stations. So, while the Church of the Sanctified Assembly isn’t real, it does have a distinctly L.A. flavor.

Why did you choose to set the story in Los Angeles as opposed to any other city? What is it about L.A. that you felt helped to sustain, bolster, or add credibility to the novel?
In a sense, Los Angeles is a character in Corrupt Practices. L.A. is, geographically and culturally, an illogical city—accidental sprawl rather than planned verticality. It’s also still a relatively new city, its history as a major urban center measured in decades, not centuries. While all cities have a gritty side, L.A.’s grit is less polished than that of cities like New York, Chicago, Boston, and San Francisco. Maybe that’s why it’s the setting for so many noir novels—and Corrupt Practices has a noir feel.

L.A. also provides fertile ground for the development of a new religion like the Church of the Sanctified Assembly, which promotes materialism and celebrity as part of its tenets. And L.A. is a good place to hide your past, as a number of characters in the novel do. Finally, the novel derives much of its character by portraying some uniquely Los Angeles subcultures—the movie industry, the porn business, entertainment law firms, and of course, automobile traffic.

What's next for Parker Stern?
I’m currently working on the next Parker Stern novel. A reclusive, iconoclastic video game developer known to the world only as “Poniard” has released an online game that charges a Hollywood tycoon with the 1987 abduction and murder of an actress. Poniard hires Parker to defend him in the tycoon’s libel lawsuit. When Parker starts investigating the actress’s disappearance, he starts uncovering secrets that very dangerous people want to keep hidden.

Robert Rotstein will be signing copies of Corrupt Practices this Sunday, June 30, at Book’em Mysteries in Pasadena.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. SteamChip posted on 06/30/2013 09:59 AM
    >and might have staged her own kidnapping to cover up plastic surgery, an abortion—or maybe just for publicity.<

    What I find interesting about the 1926 Aimee Semple McPherson kidnapping after looking extensively into the matter are among but not limited to the following:
    1--the criminal charges against McPherson were fairly close to as described: but more so to hide an alleged affair with a former employee.
    2--if convicted of the charges, maximum prison time for McPherson would be about 42 years.
    3--Except as a resource to local officials, the FBI did not investigate kidnappings until 1932. Prior to that year investigation of the crime was jurisdiction of local authorities according to their competence and flow of regional politics.
    4--A structure fitting closely the description McPherson gave of her prison shack was found in the desert in September of 1926, but Los Angeles police declined to investigate.
    5--Except for two individuals (whose accounts were widely publicized by the Los Angeles press and later book authors) everyone else in Douglas Arizona, the town McPherson convalesced in after her escape through the desert; supported her story. These included the mayor, other law enforcement individuals, and experienced trackers.
    6--Hundreds of reporters and police officials from Los Angeles and elsewhere investigating even years later, an estimated $500,000 spent (about 6.4 2013 dollars), and they could not prove McPherson's story false.
    7-- The Court of Historical Review and Appeal in San Francisco, which holds no legal authority, is made up of members of the bench who examine and retry historical cases and controversies. In April 1990, a decision was handed down: there was never any substantial evidence to show McPherson's story was untrue.

    The case speaks extensively about law and justice, some of which is relevant today. The power elite of California and competing clergy, did not have any interest in investigating a kidnapping, were against McPherson and instead influenced the prosecution to prove her story wrong. However, because their evidence and witness were discredited, the charges against McPherson were dropped. The defense cost to McPherson was staggering as well, around $100,000, or about 1,300,000 in 2013 dollars.
showing all comments

Stay Connected

 
Get Our LAmag.com Free Newsletter
 
more promotions
 
Advertisement
Subscribe to Los Angeles magazine
 
Close

Advertisement