The Results of the 405 Redo: It’s Complicated

195

Officials at Metro and the California Department of Transportation, the bureaucracies behind the $1 billion 405 improvement project that wrapped a few months ago, just received an unwelcome gift: a study that found traffic is actually worse now that the freeway is outfitted with new bridges, on- and off-ramps, and a northbound carpool lane.

Traffic analysis firm INRIX conducted the study, which looked at rush-hour speeds on the notorious freeway during September 2013–when only 1.7 miles of the carpool lane were completed–and last month, when the entire 10 mile high-occupancy vehicle lane was operating for 10 miles between the 10 and 101 freeways. During the onset and apex of rush-hour, between 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., traffic is now worse; on average, it look a minute longer to get from West L.A. to Sherman Oaks. There was one bright spot: congestion at 7 p.m., the tail end of rush-hour, was reduced significantly, with four to five minutes of drive-time shaved off.

Regardless, the news was greeted with many shaking heads and rolled eyes, especially the people clamoring for a light-rail or subway option through the Sepulveda Pass (one is coming, sometime in the 2030s; in the meantime, a new express bus debuts over the Pass in December). A director at INRIX, Jim Bak, remains supportive of the 405’s carpool lane and other upgrades, saying they weren’t failures; in fact, the traffic increase is most likely result of a strengthening economy. Throughout the nation, congestion is growing at three times the gross domestic project.

“When our economy recovers, I like to say, ‘as GDP goes up, MPH goes down,'” Bak told KPCC, adding that without the 405 project, the commute would be even worse. We shudder to think.

Facebook Comments