Hot Air: Why Don’t We Take the Santa Ana Winds More Seriously?

The Santa Anas kicked up a whole lot more than dust last winter

1 Comment

Arborgeddon. That’s the term we learned last December when Los Angeles experienced one of the worst windstorms of the past century. The particular strain of Santa Anas was Hulk-like, threatening power lines, smashing in windows, and KO’ing street signs at 97 miles per hour. Pasadena got hit the hardest, with $20 million in damages. It was unexpectedly catastrophic. For those who sat inside a rattling house and watched 100-foot-tall trees topple over, the storms were an eye-opener. The Santa Anas could be that dangerous?

Perilous winds have always been associated with the East Coast (felled trees were one of the leading causes of death during Hurricane Sandy). For us, earthquakes, wildfires, and mud slides have been the natural disasters that get all the attention, while the Santa Anas have been portrayed as the crazy cousin who couldn’t get into the calamity club. They’ve been blamed for headaches and sore eyes and loopy behavior—and for fanning flames—but the mayhem they unleashed last year was uncharted. As streets were clogged with branches and blocks remained powerless for days, a lot of people just weren’t prepared—particularly SoCal Edison. The company’s botched response led to an investigation by the California Public Utilities Commission.

One reason people might not take the winds seriously? Predictability. “The weather service can’t tell you about earthquakes, but they can warn you about wind, which reduces fear,” says Dr. Lucy Jones, the senior science adviser for risk reduction with the U.S. Geological Survey. “You can’t stop wind—the same way you can’t stop a drunk driver on the freeway—but there’s an illusion of control.” Not for long. Climate change is shifting wind patterns all over the world. Irregular Santa Anas may become routine. Now that blows.

Related Content

Comments

  1. ray palermo

    December 28, 2012 at 2:44 pm

    I read with interest your article, “Hot Air: Why Don’t We Take the Santa Ana Winds More Seriously?” by Nancy Miller. During storm seasons, the power grid, building construction, and other related conditions are at the forefront of everyone’s mind. But, the increased number and severity of “wind events” nationally should prompt a reexamination in every community.

    My company, Verisk Analytics, conducted an analysis using our severe-storm computer models and compared them to our database of millions of commercial buildings that we survey to examine factors that may improve — or worsen — a building’s wind resistance or damageability. Our analysis shows that roughly 38 percent of the total U.S. insured property value is in coastal counties. In New York, 62 percent of insured value is along the coast. In Florida, that number skyrockets to almost 80 percent — but it is by no means exclusively a coastal phenomenon. Eighteen of the top 20 catastrophic events in the U.S. involved wind (13 hurricanes, 4 tornadoes, and a severe wind and hail event). Only the Northridge earthquake and the attacks of 9/11 did not involve a wind peril. Compounding the problem is the overall storm trend. Of those 18 wind events, 15 occurred since 2000.

    Communities and individuals are always concerned about fire, which continues to be the most common cause of property loss. However, it is now evident that property owners, the construction industry, municipalities responsible for local building codes, and others all need to become more proactive in addressing the threat of wind and storm events.

    Mory Katz
    Vice President
    Verisk Insurance Solutions – Commercial Property