Here’s Why Sid Grauman’s Name Should Not Disappear From His Chinese Theatre

3 Comments

Elie Samaha and Don Kushner, who purchased Grauman’s Chinese Theatre from mall owner CIM at a reported cost of $10 million in 2011, announced this morning that they have sold naming rights to the Hollywood showplace. The gentlemen have earned half their investment back in a deal to strip off Sid Grauman’s name and rename the theater in honor of  Chinese TV manufacturer TCL. Samaha and Kushner, who brought the world Battlefield: Earth and Animalympics, say they plan to use the money to add LED screens, digital signs, and extensively remodel the interior of the 1927 landmark, which was restored in 2001. Sid Grauman ran the downtown Metropolitan, the largest theater in Los Angeles, before moving to Hollywood Boulevard in 1922 when he opened Grauman’s Egyptian, where he invented the movie premiere with a giant party for Douglas Fairbanks’s Robin Hood. Five years later, he cemented his legacy with the glorious Chinese and it’s forecourt filled with celebrity autographs. Now I won’t harp on about Grauman’s refined love of the cinema, he ran some hokey programs and handed out plaques to horses, puppets and even his own mom, but he also created the showy prologues, the gimmick with the footprints, interviews with the stars on the red carpet and invented a genre, which invented Hollywood. I hope these guys realize what an icon they have here and maybe lay off inviting folks like Simon Cowell or Taylor Lautner to leave indelible marks in a rapidly filling courtyard. I hope they use a light hand when plastering the most recognized building in our city with billboards promoting a device designed to make people stay out of movie theaters. I think we all agree a few things are sacred. Don’t take Sid’s name off this place. C’mon.

Related Content

Comments

  1. Norman

    January 12, 2013 at 3:24 am

    How long was it Mann’s Chinese Theatre? The LA Times is saying they also have
    commitments to upgrade to theatre. Unfortunately with the Arclight and Ipic they
    have competition. As long as the Forecourt and main theatre are preserved I’ll be happy.
    If they can figure out a way to get rid of the people in tacky costumes and street hawkers
    the experience would be vastly improved. I don’t care if it’s Grauman’s or TCL its got to
    be about the movie experience. The Chinese needs improvement. Oh, and tear down that tacky megaplex. THAT cheapened the name………

    Reply

  2. jen

    January 12, 2013 at 3:54 pm

    Graumans name is still on the building and will stay there forever as a tribute. I know that’s a huge part of the deal if you read all of the facts.

    Reply

  3. Richard H oudek

    January 15, 2013 at 7:04 pm

    I agree that Grauman’s must remain attached to Grauman’s Chinese. I recall the grim days of the theater when, as reporters we wouldd attempt to glide around the repugnant “Mann’s Chinese” only to have Ted Mann’s lawyers threaten to sue if we did not correct our historical assertion. Let the Chinese technology hawkers with their five million pieces of silver into the Chinese if they wish, but do allow Sid Grauman to continue his reign on Hollywood Boulevard, and allow the interior to remain intact, as tasteless as it might be in some ways. To many of us it will alway be Grauman’s Chinese, as the old newspaper ad logo used to proclaim, “the world’s most famous theatre.”

    Reply