CityDig: Why Has the Lady Turned Her Back on Echo Park Lake? - CityThink - Los Angeles magazine
 
 

CityDig: Why Has the Lady Turned Her Back on Echo Park Lake?

Photograph courtesy Photo Collection, Los Angeles Public Library

A familiar face will greet visitors from a new location when Echo Park reopens to the public next month. The Lady of the Lake, long a serene presence on Echo Park Lake’s southeastern edge, has returned to her original perch on the north shore.

As part of the New Deal-era Public Works of Art Project, local artist Ada May Sharpless sculpted the statue in 1934. It was meant to represent L.A.’s patron saint, the Queen of the Angeles—a point driven home by the bas-relief depictions of City Hall and a Spanish mission on the statue’s pedestal. But when the sculpture first appeared lakeside in 1935, parkgoers saw something else in the cast-stone statue: the Lady of the Lake, a magical woman from Arthurian legend.

Standing at the tip of a peninsula on the lake’s north shore, the Lady of the Lake remained an Echo Park fixture until vandalism forced it into storage in 1980. When it returned in 1999, the city placed the statue on the southeastern shore, facing toward the lake. Recently, as part of a two-year, $85-million overhaul to improve the lake’s water quality, the Lady wandered back to her original location on Echo Park’s north side.

“It was moved to its historic location in order to preserve and enhance the historic nature of the park,” said Katie Doherty, a member of the project’s design team. “We also relocated the pump house from that location to the southeast corner of the park in order to restore what is probably the best vista point at the park.”

But the statue’s new orientation has raised eyebrows. As Jesus Sanchez reported on his Eastsider blog, some neighborhood residents objected that the Lady seemed to be turning her back on the lake. Project designers, however, insist that the orientation was no sign of disrespect. Instead, it satisfies one of the renovation’s overarching goals: historical accuracy.

“Because Echo Park Lake is a City of Los Angeles Cultural Historic Monument, special care was taken to mimic historic conditions,” Doherty explained.

Consulting historical photographs like the one above from Los Angeles Public Library Photo Collection, the team determined that the Lady had always faced north. Thus she stands that way today—her back turned to the lake, and her gaze fixed upon visitors approaching the north shore.

 

Weigh in: Which way should the Lady of the Lake statue face?

Away from the lake, as she did in 1935
OR
toward the lake, as a sign of respect

Leave your opinion in the comments section below.


Nathan Masters of the USC Libraries blogs here on behalf of L.A. as Subject, an association of more than 230 libraries, cultural institutions, official archives, and private collectors hosted by the USC Libraries and dedicated to preserving and telling the sometimes-hidden histories of Los Angeles.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. Cliff posted on 05/21/2013 08:00 PM
    Away. That is the way I remember it from my youth.
  2. Purposeless posted on 05/22/2013 12:18 PM
    Los Angeles Magazine has taken the $85 million newly renovated Echo Park Lake and attempts to stir a pissing match over which way the Lady of the Lake faces. Your mindless, immature and harmful coverage is an embarrassment and ridiculous at best, only illustrating a new high for the magazine's muckraking. I would think better of USC Libraries to preserve and tell the hidden histories of L.A. rather than condemn it for comments on a blog.
  3. Baker posted on 05/22/2013 02:20 PM
    If the choice is to either have the statue disrespect the lake or disrespect the People, I say respect the People. Always.
  4. Russ posted on 05/23/2013 12:55 PM
    I am for history. I believe what was created in the past comes directly from the artist. The original artist's intent should be the only thing subject to "respect". Interpretation (or mis-interpretation) is up to the observer and the critic. But you cannot judge a piece of art accurately if you jockey it around so it is not exactly like the artist intended.

    We should be a little more "respectful" of our past than we all seem too busy to be. Maybe we can actually learn something. She should face where she faced in 1935.
showing all comments
 
more promotions
Subscribe to Los Angeles magazine
 

Stay Connected

 
Get Our LAmag.com Free Newsletter
Close

Advertisement